The Trump administration wants to take greater control of scientific grants. Here’s why that’s a terrible idea
Since World War II, the United States has dominated science and technology. With more than 400 Nobel Prizes , it dwarfs every other country. Major breakthroughs like nuclear energy, genetic engineering, and the internet were all led by researchers and engineers in the U.S. Today, it leads in every major technological category. To a great extent, this has been the result of government action.…
The Trump administration’s proposal to grant political oversight to scientific grants has sparked outrage, as it threatens to undermine the very foundation of America's scientific dominance. For decades, the U.S. has been a global leader in science and technology, thanks in large part to government-backed research initiatives. Institutions like the NIH, NSF, and DARPA have been instrumental in pioneering groundbreaking technologies that have transformed society.
From the internet and GPS to lithium-ion batteries, many of today's essential technologies owe their origins to government funding. This success can be traced back to a pivotal report, "Science: The Endless Frontier," penned by Vannevar Bush in 1945. Bush argued that basic research is crucial in developing new knowledge and practical applications, with government-funded research being the driving force behind technological breakthroughs.
The fear is that a political intervention in science could lead to a permanent brain drain, as top talent might flee from a climate of uncertainty and interference. History has shown that when science is politicized, the results are disastrous. The case of Trofim Lysenko in the Soviet Union serves as a stark reminder. Lysenko, a Soviet agronomist, rejected mainstream scientific theories like the gene concept and Darwin's theories.
Supported by Joseph Stalin, Lysenko propagated unproven ideas that stifled legitimate scientific research, leading to disastrous agricultural practices and the suppression of credible scientists. To avoid a similar fate, it is crucial to maintain a separation between scientific decision-making and political influence. The integrity of scientific theories, such as general relativity and quantum mechanics, is essential for the development of future technologies like quantum computing, synthetic biology, and materials science.
Restoring trust in scientific institutions and ensuring that research priorities align with national interests should be a top priority for policymakers.
Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
