Spain’s ‘grandchildren’s law’ before the Supreme Court: Who can vote on November 29?

On Monday, October 12, 2026, the Supreme Court emphasized the need to strike a balance between religious sentiments and public health concerns regarding restrictions on firecrackers in the national capital and surrounding areas. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, leading a three-judge Bench, stated that the judiciary would not violate religious sentiments but encouraged individuals to take responsibility in this matter. It was crucial, the Chief Justice added, that the whole process be approached with a balanced mindset.

During the hearing, Justice Joymalya Bagchi posed a question about the religious justification for bursting firecrackers. Senior advocate Aparajita Singh, the amicus curiae in the case, highlighted the health risks associated with air pollution, particularly affecting children, senior citizens, and individuals with health vulnerabilities.

Ms. Singh suggested that the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), the statutory body responsible for managing air quality in the region, should address the medical concerns related to air pollution.

However, the Bench cautioned against imposing restrictions that would prove difficult to enforce in practice. Chief Justice Surya Kant stressed the need to educate people about the harmful and less harmful firecrackers, encouraging a cultural shift towards traditional practices like lighting lamps and using sparklers. Additionally, the CJI proposed promoting restrictions on the availability of more harmful varieties of crackers.