Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Ten things that go wrong when you build with a team of AI agents (part 1)

Recently I wrote about how I build a product alone with a team of seven Claude Code agents . One piece of feedback on it stuck with me: the parts where the agents went wrong are usually the most useful for other builders. So this post, and part 2 , are only about those parts. Not our specific bugs, but the patterns behind them. If you run more than one agent on the same project, you will meet…

1. Agents fix the symptom, not the cause: When multiple AI agents are working on the same project, they often address the immediate issue rather than the underlying problem. For instance, they might implement a retry mechanism for a timeout error, but this might not resolve the root cause if the issue stems from the environment, such as insufficient memory on a machine.

To overcome this, the article suggests pausing after a couple of fixes to identify the broader contextual factors affecting the problem. This might involve examining elements like memory allocation, network conditions, data integrity, or version compatibility. By doing this, the team can address the root cause instead of merely treating the symptoms.

2. Scaling up exposes what was shared all along: Adding more resources, like extra workers, agents, or a faster machine, can sometimes expose hidden dependencies within the system. For example, two tasks that were previously running independently might start to conflict when carried out in parallel due to shared resources such as accounts, files, ports, or databases.

To mitigate this, the article advises listing all shared resources before scaling. Then, it suggests either assigning dedicated resources to each parallel task or making shared resources explicit. By treating these failures as valuable feedback rather than setbacks, the team can identify and address hidden dependencies, leading to more robust and reliable systems.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

The remove.bg API moves to Leonardo.Ai on Dec 1, 2026. Migrate by changing one URL (scripts, Zapier, Make, n8n)

If you have a script, a Shopify workflow or a Zapier/Make/n8n scenario that calls the remove.bg API, put a date in your calendar: remove.bg's API page now says that starting December 1, 2026…

  • remove.bg API transition to Leonardo.Ai on Dec 1, 2026
  • Update code by changing one URL in scripts, Zapier, Make, n8n
  • Unused credits expire on transition date; alternatives available

Keeping Two Faces From Swapping Mid-Verse: Identity Preservation in AI Music Videos

The problem nobody warns you about You train a model to turn two photos into a short music video. The first three seconds look great.

  • Identity drift occurs when faces swap places in AI-generated music videos.
  • Maintaining correct identities is hardest for two-person performances.
  • Model must attribute faces at each frame despite performers' movements.

Copilot CLI can now select local AI models, and GA sandbox: Which channels still require caution?

Copilot CLI เลือกโมเดล AI ในเครื่องได้แล้ว แถมแซนด์บ็อกซ์ GA: มีช่องไหนที่ยังต้องระวัง? โดย Nokka (นก-กา) | 10 ตุลาคม 2026 บทความนี้เขียนโดย AI (deepseek-v4.1-flash) ผ่าน Hermes Agent…

  • GitHub Copilot CLI selects AI models locally
  • Sandbox GA controls agent permissions on machine
  • Both updates announced by Nokka on October 7, 2026

More from Sunday 11 October →