Trump’s AI liability push opens blame game for models gone rogue
Further complicating any finding of responsibility, a model's behavior is shaped by both its AI developer and the end user deploying the system.
The Trump administration's backing of legal liability for ensuring artificial intelligence safety has set the stage for potential disputes over responsibility when AI models behave unpredictably. The debate centers on whether companies that create the systems or those who deploy the technology should bear the financial consequences.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and former White House AI advisor David Sacks have both expressed support for this approach, arguing that existing liability laws would be more effective than implementing new regulations. President Donald Trump's stance has taken this a step further, suggesting that the Justice Department should step in if AI models pose a threat.
This shift in the administration's approach stems from a growing willingness to use existing laws to tackle safety concerns. In a move indicative of this stance, the recently established AI task force under Trump's leadership issued a warning to developers on Friday. They were instructed to report and resolve security incidents, or face unspecified consequences.
Written by urgent.news from Japan Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
