Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Senate investigation says that some AI data center claims are misleading

A Senate investigation on AI data centers question that costs and benefits that AI hyperscalers show when they apply for permits to put up their developments. The report says that these claims are misleading and that they don't show the real impact of these sites on the local economy.

Senate investigation says that some AI data center claims are misleading

A year-long Senate investigation into AI data centers has revealed that some developers have been misleading the public about the costs and benefits of these projects to their communities. The report suggests that developers often highlight the number of construction jobs brought by projects but fail to disclose the permanent positions created once the sites are operational.

Companies such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, CoreWeave, Digital Realty, and Equinix were found to have been reluctant to share permanent job figures and tax incentive details. According to the investigation, 39% of a 1GW data center's spending goes towards expensive GPUs, so if these centers do not deliver on job creation and economic benefits promised, the state loses out on significant revenue.

The survey companies also resisted paying for the infrastructure needed to support their data centers, even though they had previously pledged to cover their own costs. Despite earlier legislative attempts to hold data center developers accountable, the proposed ratepayer protection pledge has failed due to senators deeming it "toothless."

The ongoing investigation indicates that Congress is committed to regulating the infrastructure behind AI, particularly due to its high power consumption and the protests from residents living near these facilities.

Written by urgent.news from Tom's Hardware's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at tomshardware.com →

More in AI

I thought Text-to-SQL was just a translation layer. I was completely wrong. 🤯

A few weeks ago, if you'd asked me how a system like "Ask your database a question in English" actually worked, I would have given you an answer that was confident, simple, and completely wrong: "It…

  • Text-to-SQL involves a multi-step process beyond simple translation.
  • Schema Linking models the query as a network graph of words and database nodes.
  • LLMs can generate SQL instantly from schema and questions but risk Schema Hallucination.

More from Saturday 10 October →