How SNAP could crunch the midterms
Changes to SNAP from Republicans’ megalaw are rolling out in a year when affordability woes top voters’ priority lists and grocery prices strain their wallets.
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is undergoing gradual changes that could impact the upcoming midterms. These modifications, instituted through Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act, include stricter work requirements, restrictions on non-citizens, and increased administrative costs for states and counties.
As of summer, the program has lost over 5 million participants nationwide, with Arizona experiencing the most significant reduction, with a majority of its food stamp recipients losing benefits. The latest adjustment, effective October 1, mandates that states and counties now cover 75% of administrative costs, up from 50%. A more substantial shift will occur the following year, when high error rate states will be responsible for some benefit costs for the first time.
This transformation in federal-state relations and the welfare state is occurring at a time when voters are prioritizing affordability concerns. Democrats see this as an opportunity to criticize Republicans, who previously used cuts to food aid and Medicaid to fund tax cuts. Republicans, however, argue that the changes aim to correct a program that wastes taxpayer money and ensure it benefits those genuinely in need.
The changes align with the Trump administration's broader agenda to crack down on fraud and promote efficiency. While Republicans may not openly discuss SNAP cuts in their campaigns, they are using the tax breaks from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to attract votes. At the state and local level, some governments are struggling to prepare for the financial implications, leading to increased property taxes and strained resources.
The move towards accountability has stirred tensions in the Senate, where Democrats are pushing for a delayed cost shift. While conservatives view the changes as essential for improving efficiency and curbing fraud, opponents argue that lower error rates should be the goal. Despite the uncertainties, the SNAP changes have coincided with a surge in people relying on charities to avoid hunger, reflecting the challenges faced by many households amid inflation.
Written by urgent.news from POLITICO's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
