Does Megyn Kelly Actually Believe What She’s Saying?

Megyn Kelly, once a prominent anchor on Fox News, has devolved into a figure of controversy and criticism in recent years. Her transformation from a respected journalist to a more controversial and polarizing presence has been marked by a shift in her demeanor and the content of her media appearances. A notable example of this transformation occurred on her daily SiriusXM and YouTube show, where she exhibited a markedly different attitude towards a woman who had filed a lawsuit alleging gang rape at Cornell University.

In her recent discussion of the lawsuit, Kelly made several disparaging remarks about the alleged victim, describing her physical appearance as "extremely beefy in her arms and legs" and criticizing her for seeking admiration from the men at Cornell. These comments were particularly controversial, as they suggested that the woman might have been seeking attention because no one would have desired her if she had not been attractive.

This perspective starkly contrasts with Kelly's earlier advocacy for female empowerment and her criticism of sexual harassment.

Kelly's shift in perspective appears to be influenced by her experiences within the media industry and the power dynamics that she has observed. She has previously faced allegations of sexual harassment from former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes and has expressed skepticism towards some high-profile sexual assault cases. The recent comments on her show suggest that Kelly's worldview has been shaped by her experiences on TV news, including both the personal challenges she has faced and the broader cultural context in which she operates.

The current performance appears to be driven by a combination of attention-seeking behavior and a belief system that has been molded by her career trajectory. While some of her comments may be an attempt to gain more viewers or generate controversy, they also reflect a worldview that has been informed by her experiences in the media and her own personal history.

This raises questions about the authenticity of her positions and the extent to which they are a genuine reflection of her beliefs or a calculated strategy to maintain relevance in a changing media landscape.