Contempt plea in SC over Delhi Metro, rail curbs; home secretary, Delhi Police chief named

New Delhi experienced increased security measures on Saturday as authorities imposed strict restrictions to deter a large protest organized by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). The party demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar in response to disputed electoral roll revisions. Thousands of police and paramilitary personnel were stationed throughout the capital, with barricades, surveillance equipment, and detention centers positioned near Jantar Mantar, the protest's intended location.

Despite being denied permission, the youth-led movement was determined to assemble. Delhi Police reinforced checkpoints at key entry routes, limited access to sensitive areas, and threatened penalties for unauthorized gatherings. Security measures included drones, closed-circuit television cameras, body-worn cameras, and personnel monitoring crowd movements.

Authorities prepared for around 7,000 demonstrators, although organizers claimed broader support. Police prioritized maintaining public order while avoiding conflicts with protesters. The Ministry of Home Affairs instructed police chiefs nationwide to remain vigilant, citing potential law-and-order issues stemming from the mobilization.

Despite the restrictions, CJP representatives argued that peaceful assembly was a constitutional right. Founder Abhijeet Dipke insisted the demonstration would proceed, accusing the government of suppressing public opposition. The protest centered around allegations that the Election Commission's revision of electoral rolls had excluded eligible voters, with organizers blaming the commission for favoring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

However, both the Election Commission and the BJP denied these allegations. The dispute drew opposition parties, student organizations, and civil society campaigners into demands for greater transparency and accountability. Security officials noted approximately 35,000 police and paramilitary personnel were available for deployment, with additional forces mobilized from outside Delhi.

Police detained hundreds of people during security operations, although CJP leaders claimed larger numbers. Transport restrictions included curtailed Metro access, canceled or rescheduled railway services, and restricted mobile internet access in central Delhi. Critics argued these measures infringed on communication and freedom of movement.

The Supreme Court's intervention led to some adjustments, but police retained the power to regulate access to vulnerable areas. Delhi Traffic Police designated 30 locations for possible diversions, urging commuters to allow additional travel time. Police urged restraint and professional conduct during crowd-control operations.