Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

2026's OLED monitors can nearly recreate the sublime clarity of a '90s CRT, but Windows will have to change before we can achieve true nirvana

All you need is a ridiculously fast monitor and endless patience for tinkering to get a glimpse of how good retro games looked in motion back in the '90s.

2026's OLED monitors can nearly recreate the sublime clarity of a '90s CRT, but Windows will have to change before we can achieve true nirvana

In 2007, the TV show Lost concluded with an unforgettable twist, revealing that what had appeared to be a flashback was actually a flash forward. Protagonists Jack and Kate miraculously escaped the mysterious island, a goal that had been the driving force behind the series. This feeling of wanting to return to the past is how Mark Rejhon, founder of Blur Busters, feels about many technological advancements.

Just a few months prior, he had invested $1,000 in his first HD display, a 26-inch 1366x768 Samsung LCD. While the LCD represented a significant leap forward in terms of size, thickness, and sharpness compared to the CRT monitor connected to his family's PC, it still fell short of the sublime clarity offered by CRTs.

CRTs, or cathode ray tube monitors, have a distinct advantage over modern displays when it comes to motion clarity. This is primarily due to the gentle phosphor fade of a CRT, which is less flickery than the harsh black frame insertion (BFI) method used in other displays. The Blur Busters browser tool, aptly named after a little green man in a red saucer, has been a popular tool for determining the motion clarity of modern screens.

Its test, the UFO, has shown that even today's high refresh rate monitors are still struggling to match the clarity of CRTs. While advancements in hardware and software, such as Nvidia's G-Sync Pulsar and Blur Busters' CRT simulation algorithm, are pushing the boundaries of motion clarity, OLED monitors have yet to fully embrace this technology.

Written by urgent.news from PC Gamer's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at pcgamer.com →

More in Tech

Word never stores the list numbers you see — a DOCX converter has to run a numbering engine

A law firm sent me a 60-page contract to convert, and by section 7 every cross-reference was off by one. The text said "as set out in clause 6.3" while the heading it pointed to read "6.4".

  • List numbers in DOCX files are not stored, only computed at render time.
  • Word's numbering engine handles formatting, start values, and overrides.
  • Accurate conversion requires implementing ECMA-376 sequence resolution rules.

The Epistemology of Quality

Should we expect human software developers to review code written by AI? For many the answer is clearly yes: how else will we maintain accountability?

  • Traditional code review focused on syntax and standards, lacking teaching opportunities.
  • Pair programming combined various evidence types, providing stronger defect detection.
  • AI-generated code may lack real-world proof, making manual review critical.

adagents.json vs ads.txt and schain: Four Files, Two Supply-Chain Questions

In early October 2026, IAB Tech Lab's programmatic supply-chain leadership pushed back on the idea that adagents.json should replace ads.txt , sellers.json , and the OpenRTB SupplyChain object.

  • adagents.json could replace ads.txt, sellers.json, and OpenRTB SupplyChain object
  • Adagents.json lists authorized agents with agent URLs and property scope
  • Adagents.json does not replace ads.txt, sellers.json, or schain

More from Saturday 10 October →