The fight over using super for housing has deep roots in Australian politics. But would it actually work? | Emily Millane
Ultimately, the debate is a battle for power over Australians’ savings pool of $4.8tn dating back to the scheme’s inception Past/Present is a column which places current events in historical context Should you be able to take money out of your super to pay for housing? One Nation has recently suggested you should. Liberal senator Andrew Bragg has also revived the idea. The treasurer, Jim…
The debate over using superannuation funds for housing has deep roots in Australian politics, but its feasibility and implications remain uncertain. According to a recent column, the issue is a power struggle over Australians' collective savings of $4.8 trillion, accumulated since the scheme's inception. One Nation and Liberal senator Andrew Bragg have both proposed allowing funds to be withdrawn for housing purposes, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers warns that the Coalition and One Nation are "coming after super" and could "vandalise" the retirement savings system.
Chalmers further suggests that the next federal election may hinge on a superannuation referendum. As Australians grapple with a cost-of-living crisis and housing shortage, the question of balancing savings for retirement with immediate financial needs has gained prominence. The potential impact of altering this balance on cost-of-living pressures remains a contentious point.
Written by urgent.news from The Guardian Australia's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
