Programming Isn’t Special
Many creative professionals, including writers, artists, and YouTubers, are vehemently rejecting the use of artificial intelligence in their respective fields. However, programmers are an exception to this trend. The reasoning behind this difference lies in the perception that programming is not art. They argue that if a tool can accomplish a task effectively, and the job merely requires functional output, then the use of AI is justified.
This perspective, however, is misguided. Programming can be considered art as well, and dismissing it as such is an oversimplification. The term "art" encompasses various expressions, and programming, like any other form of creative expression, is a valuable form of labor. By dismissing programming as functional and mundane, we overlook its inherent value and potential for aesthetic exploration.
Just as novels and journalism serve essential functions in society, programming plays a crucial role in creating software and digital solutions. The skills required for programming, such as problem-solving and creative thinking, are akin to those used in artistic pursuits. By acknowledging the artistic merit in programming, we can foster a greater appreciation for the craft and promote the development of more innovative and aesthetically pleasing software.
Written by urgent.news from Lobsters's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Programming Isn't Special blog.glyph.im