Map Shows 40 States Backing NFL's Supreme Court Prediction Market Fight
Thirty-nine states are backing New Jersey as the NFL urges the Supreme Court to clarify who regulates sports prediction markets.
Forty states, spanning the political spectrum, have joined the NFL in requesting the Supreme Court's intervention in the ongoing dispute over sports prediction markets. Attorneys general from 39 states, the District of Columbia, and New Jersey filed a brief arguing that platforms like Kalshi should comply with state gambling regulations, despite the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's claim of exclusive jurisdiction.
The NFL contends that these contracts involve financial products governed by federal law, while state regulators assert they should be licensed, taxed, and restricted by individual states. At the core of the debate lies the question of whether sports prediction contracts are gambling or financial instruments. The NFL emphasizes the necessity of stronger protections against insider influence and underage participation, while prediction-market companies argue for a unified federal framework.
The Supreme Court's decision, if it decides to hear the case, could determine the future of sports speculation in the nation's fastest-growing industry.
Written by urgent.news from Newsweek's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
