Global condemnation widens over deadly Saudi airport strikes
International condemnation of Houthi attacks on two Saudi Arabian airports has intensified, with the United Nations, France, Britain and several Middle Eastern governments denouncing strikes that killed three civilians and injured 36 others. The attacks targeted Abha International Airport and King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh on October 6 and 7, according to Saudi Arabia’s General…
Recent Houthi missile strikes on two Saudi Arabian airports have drawn widespread condemnation from international bodies, including the United Nations, France, Britain, Middle Eastern governments, India, and Egypt. The attacks killed three civilians and injured 36 others, including foreign residents and passengers, at Abha International Airport and King Khalid International Airport in Saudi Arabia.
France expressed solidarity with Saudi Arabia, calling for an immediate halt to the strikes. Britain also condemned the attacks, urging a cessation of hostilities. The United Arab Emirates and Egypt denounced the assaults, warning that attacks on civilian facilities threaten Saudi Arabia's security and regional stability. India's Ministry of External Affairs described the targeting of civilian infrastructure as unacceptable, expressing solidarity with Saudi Arabia and offering condolences to the bereaved families.
The Saudi-led coalition has responded to escalating attacks with military operations against Houthi positions in Yemen, although the impact of these operations remains unclear. Air travel in the region has been disrupted, with multiple airlines cancelling flights to Riyadh, citing security concerns. The Houthi movement claimed responsibility for the attacks, describing them as part of its confrontation with Saudi-backed forces in Yemen.
Diplomatic calls have emphasized the need to protect civilian infrastructure and prevent further casualties in the ongoing conflict between Houthi forces and Yemeni government-aligned troops.
Written by urgent.news from Arabian Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.