'City can't be brought to a halt': Delhi Police's rationale for restrictions

Delhi Police has defended its restrictions on a proposed protest by the Cockroach Janta Party at Jantar Mantar, asserting a need to prioritize public safety and maintain the city's functioning. The police cited past incidents of violence and assaults on women constables as reasons for the temporary curbs. The organizers were reportedly participating without the necessary permissions, and the force emphasized that the measures were necessary to prevent overcrowding and ensure the safety of citizens, residents, shopkeepers, and others in the vicinity.

In a statement on X, the Delhi Police explained that while the right to protest must be protected, public safety and the city's smooth functioning are equally important. They highlighted that permission was granted for a one-day demonstration, but it had been ongoing for a month, with over 2,000 individuals with criminal backgrounds joining the protest, leading to violence.

More than 200 police personnel sustained injuries, and student injuries were reported as well. The police also mentioned that women constables had been assaulted during the protests.

The police pointed out that Jantar Mantar's limited capacity of 1,000 people necessitated restrictions to prevent overcrowding and safeguard everyone present. They aimed to strike a balance between the protesters' right to assemble and the city's safety and economic interests. The police emphasized that seeking permission allows authorities to estimate crowd sizes, plan traffic diversions, ensure emergency access, and facilitate safe movement around the protest area.

This approach enables a peaceful assembly while allowing the city's daily operations to continue unhindered.

The Cockroach Janta Party was proceeding with the gathering without proper authorization, according to the police, citing the Supreme Court's stance on unlawful protests without permission. The organizers were responsible for informing attendees about the legal implications. The police restrictions were temporary and intended to regulate the flow of people, prevent overcrowding, and maintain safety for all involved.

The police assured that these measures were aimed at allowing the public to voice their concerns peacefully without endangering public safety or disrupting the city's functioning.