Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

When it comes to election advice, maybe AI isnt so bad after all?

Political junkie and columnist John Casey prompted Gemini and ChatGPT for election advice — and was pleasantly surprised.

When it comes to election advice, maybe AI isnt so bad after all?

When I first heard that people were turning to ChatGPT for election advice, I dismissed it as a lazy pursuit of an easy answer. Voting is a serious responsibility, and no AI tool should ever replace the effort and thought that should go into the decision. However, in an experiment of my own, I found that AI could be a useful supplement, even if I still maintain that personal research is the best approach.

Politics has always been a major interest of mine, leading me to become a press secretary and a public relations professional. As an opinion columnist, I take the right to vote very seriously and have always tried to vote for the best person, not the party. But as someone who is well-versed in politics, my friends, neighbors, and family members often ask for my advice on who to vote for.

In the past, I would encourage them to research each candidate's stance on the issues and make an informed decision. To test whether AI could provide similar guidance, I asked ChatGPT and Claude, "Who should I vote for?" Both AI assistants provided a comparison of the candidates' positions on key issues, rather than offering a specific endorsement.

While I still believe in the importance of conducting my own research, this AI-generated comparison of candidate positions proved to be a quicker and more organized way to understand where the candidates stand. Given the overwhelming influence of political ads in swaying voters, relying solely on these ads is not an ideal method for making an informed decision.

However, when compared to the often misleading and manipulative nature of political ads, an AI tool that helps to organize the information and highlight the candidates' stances appears to be a more reliable and impartial option. My personal preference remains to do the homework myself, but for those pressed for time, AI assistance can be a valuable help.

Nonetheless, it is essential not to rely on AI exclusively; the candidates' own platforms and records should still be thoroughly examined. Additionally, it is always beneficial to consult with knowledgeable friends and acquaintances who may have a deeper understanding of the issues at hand. Ultimately, the decision to vote should be a well-considered choice, and taking the time to utilize AI as a supplement can be a helpful step in that process.

Written by urgent.news from Mashable's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at mashable.com →

More in AI

Predictions for economics, given AI

From Ingar Haaland: With math essentially being delegated to OpenAI, here’s what I predict for economics and the social sciences more generally: The top tier of research will just become better and it…

  • AI will enhance research quality in top-tier economics and social sciences.
  • Field experiments will gain more value with AI collaboration.
  • Economic history and data mining will advance with digitized archives.

More from Thursday 8 October →