‘Mangaung wants non-residential property owners to pay for others’ debt’
Rather improve efficiency, says Sapoa
The South African Property Owners Association (Sapoa) is seeking a court injunction to challenge the City of Mangaung's refuse removal tariffs for non-residential properties, arguing they are unconstitutional. The tariffs link to property values, which Sapoa claims constitutes a form of tax, despite the tariffs being imposed without proper legal approval.
Mangaung claims it is trying to address a budget shortfall by collecting revenue from properties that are not paying for the service. Sapoa's CEO, Neil Gopal, contends that the tariffs are unlawful and that the city's inefficiencies should not be passed onto law-abiding property owners. Meanwhile, Mangaung's Mayor, Gregory Nthatisi, argues that the tariffs are lawful and aimed at cost recovery, and that the property value bands used in the tariff calculation are necessary to achieve cost reflectivity.
Written by urgent.news from The Citizen's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
