Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

EY breach reaches Goldman Sachs, Man Group clients

Ernst & Young has notified clients linked to Goldman Sachs’ wealth management business and hedge fund Man Group that personal and financial information was compromised through a technology platform used to support EY’s tax services. The disclosures broaden the known impact of a cyber incident first reported to US regulators in July. Affected information included names, addresses, tax identifiers,…

Ernst & Young has informed clients connected to Goldman Sachs' wealth management division and hedge fund Man Group that their personal and financial data may have been exposed due to a security breach in a technology platform supporting EY's tax services. The news of the incident, initially reported to US regulators in July, now includes a broader list of affected organizations.

The compromised information encompasses names, addresses, tax identifiers, email addresses, and financial details related to investment holdings. Goldman Sachs and Man Group have confirmed that their own systems were not affected by the breach. EY attributes the intrusion to an unauthorised third party gaining access to its third-party information technology service-management platform between March 28 and April 12.

The affected clients include Goldman Sachs' wealth management division, London-listed Man Group, and property developer Tishman Speyer. EY has notified federal law enforcement and provided credit monitoring and identity-protection services to affected individuals. The breach's impact on Goldman Sachs and Man Group primarily pertains to the exposure of customer or investor information within the compromised support workflow.

Written by urgent.news from Arabian Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at thearabianpost.com →

More in Tech

"The second most expensive x402 mistake: treating verify as settlement"

/verify returned isValid: true . So you did the work. Then /settle answered {"errorReason":"invalid_payload"} and a 400 that explains nothing.

  • Treat "verify" as settlement, leading to costly mistakes
  • Verify examines authorization, settle transfers funds
  • Gap between verify and settle can cause double-spending

"The fourth most expensive x402 mistake: paying without a spending policy"

The wallet is empty. Nothing failed: no reverts, no timeouts, no stuck transactions. Every payment was authorized, every signature was valid, every recipient was legitimate.

  • Paying without a spending policy is the fourth most costly mistake in the x402 system.
  • Aggregate trap allows multiple small payments totaling a large unauthorized bill.
  • Automated retry storm causes double payments due to blind retries after failures.

PORI (Phone Offline, Roam Instantly)

What I Built Every outdoor or hiking app has the same fundamental flaw: you have to stare at a screen to use it. For the Hacktoberfest Touch Grass challenge, I built PORI (Phone Offline, Roam…

  • Pori app forces phones in pockets during navigation
  • AI guide uses reverse geocoding and local landmarks
  • Open-weight models enable customizable, immersive experience

Phone field on Angular Signal Forms

Signal Forms went stable in Angular 22. They bring FormValueControl , a contract where a custom control hands the form a value and a list of errors. A toggle or a stepper meets it in a few lines.

  • Signal Forms introduced in Angular 22 with FormValueControl
  • Phone field example of custom control with formatted E.164 model value
  • Telixon package provides TelixonPhoneField directive and region picker

More from Wednesday 7 October →