U.S. Prosecutors Brand Huawei a ‘Criminal Enterprise’ as Trial Opens
U.S. prosecutors launched their case against Chinese telecommunications equipment maker Huawei on Sept. 9, accusing the company of a 20-year history of “theft, lies, and concealment.” In opening statements at the criminal trial held at Brooklyn Federal Court in New York, prosecutors characterized Hu
On September 9, U.S. prosecutors commenced their criminal trial against Huawei, a Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer, alleging a history of criminal activity spanning 20 years. During opening statements at Brooklyn Federal Court in New York, prosecutors portrayed Huawei as a criminal organization engaging in systematic theft of technology from American companies and deception of the financial system.
This trial, beginning seven years after Huawei's initial indictment in 2019, centered around allegations that the company stole trade secrets from five American tech firms, including Cisco Systems and T-Mobile, between 1999 and 2020. Specific evidence presented included footage showing a Huawei employee removing components of robotic equipment, instances of unauthorized photography of competitor equipment, and an employee recruited to replicate memory chips.
The prosecution also alleged that Huawei used shell companies to evade U.S. sanctions and deceived banks like HSBC into processing dollar transactions. The indictment includes 14 charges such as money laundering and obstruction of justice, with particular emphasis on Huawei's alleged involvement in supplying equipment to Iranian authorities that could have monitored protesters during the 2009 anti-government demonstrations in Iran.
Huawei vehemently denied all charges, arguing that the prosecution's claims were distorted by cherry-picked evidence. The defense contended that the case involved legitimate competition and innovation, not a criminal conspiracy, and that individual employee misconduct, if any, was not representative of company policy. Huawei also argued that it was unaware of the illegality of certain Iran-related transactions and that U.S. prosecutors were selectively linking individual incidents to create a conspiracy.
A pivotal piece of evidence in the trial will be statements initially made by Huawei's vice chairwoman and CFO, Meng Wanzhou, in 2018. In June, a U.S. court allowed these statements, obtained as part of a deferred prosecution agreement, to be used in the corporate trial. Should Huawei be convicted, it could face severe fines, potentially ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.
The Chinese government vehemently opposed the trial, labeling it as U.S. suppression of a Chinese company and supporting the defense of Huawei's legitimate rights. This trial occurred during the U.S.-China summit on September 24, intensifying tensions between the two nations over technological dominance. The trial is projected to last three months, with the central issue being whether prosecutors can prove a company-wide conspiracy.
Legal experts and market observers anticipate that the verdict will significantly impact Huawei's global credibility and the broader U.S.-China economic conflict, which has expanded into semiconductors and artificial intelligence.
Written by urgent.news from BusinessKorea's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
