Paul Graham Versus the Pope
Pope Leo XIV recently tweeted that there is “an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others.” As a description of how today’s models work, that’s fair enough. AI learned to paint by looking at our paintings. […] The post Paul Graham Versus the Pope appeared first on…
Pope Leo XIV recently made a distinction between art and machine-generated art, stating that there is an ontological difference even before an aesthetic one. This perspective is grounded in the fact that AI learns to create art by analyzing existing paintings. However, Paul Graham, who is also a painter, suggests that this situation is about to change.
Robots equipped with their own sensors will soon be able to perceive the world directly, rather than merely relying on borrowed images. This shift implies that an AI system that learns through its own sensory experiences will not be utilizing previously created images. When considering a robot painting a beach scene at dusk, the question arises: is it creating art?
The Pope would likely maintain his stance that an ontological difference exists. Nonetheless, as the line between borrowing and perceiving blurs, does this distinction become more a matter of faith than fact? This discussion on the nature of creativity and the role of artificial intelligence was first published on Marginal REVOLUTION.
Written by urgent.news from Marginal Revolution's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
