The Supreme Court is looking for a way to kill climate lawsuits
Inside Chief Justice John Roberts are two wolves. The first wolf is a staunch conservative who spent much of his career litigating on behalf of corporate interests. This wolf looks at a series of climate change lawsuits that could potentially cost the oil industry billions of dollars or more, and recoils in horror. The second […]
The Supreme Court is contemplating whether to quash climate lawsuits brought by state and local governments against oil companies. This decision could significantly impact the future of climate litigation in the United States. If the oil industry prevails, it may shut down climate change-related suits in state courts and potentially in federal courts as well. Conversely, if the oil industry loses, it could face numerous climate change lawsuits in state courts seeking billions of dollars in damages.
The case in question, Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, involves two oil companies and a city in Colorado suing the companies for alleged harm caused by climate change. The outcome of this case will largely depend on how the justices, particularly Chief Justice John Roberts, approach the matter. Roberts, a staunch conservative, seems concerned about the potential financial burden on the oil industry while also doubting the legal arguments presented by the companies.
Justice Samuel Alito, who owns stock in oil and gas companies, has been recused from the case. Two other justices, Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan, appear to be on the fence, with Thomas questioning the Court's jurisdiction and Kagan appearing to favor allowing the climate change lawsuits to proceed. The final decision will hinge on Roberts, who has expressed both support and skepticism regarding the oil companies' legal arguments.
Written by urgent.news from Vox's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
