Mbalula fails to secure final interdict as court orders oral evidence on vote-buying claims
The Johannesburg High Court has ordered oral evidence in Fikile Mbalula’s defamation case against Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma over allegations of vote-buying at the ANC’s 2022 conference.
Fikile Mbalula sought vindication in the Gauteng High Court, challenging Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma's claims regarding a 2022 ANC national conference. Mbalula demanded a retraction, apology, interdict, declaration of liability, and punitive costs. The court found that a dispute of fact exists over Mbalula's alleged distribution of money to delegates to influence the election outcome.
Dlamini-Zuma's allegation remains unproven, while Mbalula's denial of distributing money was criticized due to lack of supporting affidavits from those present at the clinic or conference venue. The court directed that the core factual dispute be tested through oral evidence, with Mbalula, Dlamini-Zuma, and Sibiya as the identified witnesses.
The next stage involves a pre-hearing conference to address witnesses, limited discovery, additional affidavits, and the hearing's date and duration.
Written by urgent.news from IOL's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Fikile Mbalula's bid for vindication falters in High Court iol.co.za
- Madras High Court dismisses case against building Tamil Nadu’s new Secretariat at Pattinapakkam thehindu.com
- High Court blocks JSC move to have tribunal investigate Justice Ombwayo capitalfm.africa
- Court allows ex-GISBH CEO to travel to Makkah for wife's delivery nst.com.my
- AKA and Tibz murder trial begins in the Durban High Court sabcnews.com
- ‘16 years apart’: Telangana High Court grants man divorce over false criminal case, cruelty indianexpress.com
