DMK MP defends the simultaneous polls panel’s plan to meet CJI
Separation of powers does not mean the three organs operate in watertight compartments, says Rajya Sabha P. Wilson
DMK Rajya Sabha MP P. Wilson defended the simultaneous polls panel's plan to meet Chief Justice of India (CJI) and Supreme Court judges, arguing that seeking their informal views was not unconstitutional. This stance came after opposition leader Kapil Sibal claimed the meeting would be unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers.
Wilson's letter, addressed to panel chairperson P.P. Chaudhary, emphasized that the meeting aimed to hear every relevant perspective and address legitimate concerns, not to certify or pre-judge the simultaneous polls legislation. He cited historical precedents, including a 1948 meeting between Federal Court judges and High Court Chief Justices, and Article 143 of the Constitution, which allows the President to seek the Supreme Court's opinion on questions of public importance.
Wilson also pointed out that the meeting was not unprecedented, citing a 2023 Parliamentary Panel on Law and Justice consultation with CJI N.V. Ramana and other justices. The panel met two groups, including media personalities and economists, but faced objections when media personality Sudhir Chaudhary was included in the session.
Chaudhary was questioned about his qualifications, citing a 2012 extortion case. Wilson maintained that the meeting was conducted in good faith to ensure the constitutional amendment was carefully considered and constitutionally valid.
Written by urgent.news from The Hindu's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
