Six Backup Strategies for NoSQL Databases, and What Really Fails
Seis estrategias de respaldo para bases de datos NoSQL, y qué falla de verdad No uso MS SQL Server: el enunciado lo excluye y, además, el problema que quiero estudiar es el de los motores NoSQL, donde cada familia de motor tiene una forma distinta de persistir y, sobre todo, una forma distinta de romperse. Lo que hice fue construir una aplicación que ejecuta seis estrategias de respaldo sobre…
A study was conducted on backup strategies for NoSQL databases, specifically MongoDB, Redis, and Neo4j. The study tested six backup strategies on these three databases, including logical and physical backups, and restoration of the data. The results showed that all six strategies were able to restore the data exactly as it was before, but some issues were encountered during the process, such as MongoDB's mongorestore not accepting a directory, Redis 7 not allowing the choice of where to save the RDB, and Neo4j's limitations with tags and relationships.
The study used three different versions of the databases: MongoDB 7.0.14, Redis 7.0.15, and Neo4j 5.24.0.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's report — not a translation of it. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
