‘A Statement’ Review: Tom McCarthy’s Climate Change Dramedy Is a Period Piece That Slyly Meets Our Moment

On October 30, 1980, a group of 20 experts convened at the Don CeSar Hotel in St. Petersburg, Florida, to discuss the consequences of carbon dioxide emissions on the climate. The result of their deliberations was a testament to the fact that, if given the chance, humans often hinder their own progress. This underlying message is the core theme of Tom McCarthy's film "A Statement," which is based on the true events chronicled by journalist Nathaniel Rich in his 2019 book "Losing Earth: A Recent History."

McCarthy and his team meticulously incorporated nearly every line of dialogue from the panel's pages of transcripts, delivering the dialogue in a setting that feels meticulously accurate. The film follows moderator Tom Jorling (Paul Rudd), who has organized four sessions over two days to ensure the group can finalize their statement and deliver it to Congress.

However, Jorling fails to consider the influence of each individual's personality. The diverse group includes MIT nuclear engineer David Rose (John Turturro), who presents evidence of human society's inability to adapt quickly enough; Energy Department representative David Slade (Paul Giamatti), who remains skeptical of any ideas Congress may reject; Ecologist George Woodwell (Dylan Baker) and Environmentalist Rafe Pomerance (Evan Peters), who vehemently oppose compromise; and Meteorologist John Perry (Jason Clarke), who views himself as a practical voice in the midst of excessive reactions.

The film's engaging narrative transports viewers into the atmosphere of the early 1980s, with its cigarette smoke, outdated attire, and worn-out equipment. McCarthy's approach to the project is akin to a play, focusing on the tight setting and character differentiation through the casting of experienced actors. While some actors, like Turturro, Clarke, and Giamatti, excel in their roles, others, such as Peters and Maslany, struggle to fully embody their characters.

The film acknowledges the sexism faced by the female characters, but its treatment of them is ultimately disappointing. Despite a few minor shortcomings, McCarthy's film effectively captures a specific moment in history, providing a powerful commentary on climate change and the resilience of human nature.