Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

The secret to using AI without getting dumber

For many people, using AI chatbots is incredible at first. It makes them feel productive, confident, maybe even smarter. But later, there’s a hangover. Perhaps there are problems with their memory, or certain skills, like writing or coding, don’t seem to be as sharp as they once were. Maybe they feel like they can’t solve […]

The secret to using AI without getting dumber

Many individuals find using AI chatbots initially invigorating, as it boosts their sense of productivity and confidence, even to the point of feeling smarter. However, this feeling often fades, giving rise to concerns about memory issues or diminished skills such as writing or coding. Some individuals may also experience difficulties in problem-solving, decision-making, or recalling facts without the aid of AI.

Susette Brooks, a marketing director based in Philadelphia, initially used AI tools reluctantly but soon realized the adverse effects. She allowed AI to assist with some of her emails, which relieved her workload, but subsequently noticed her writing and thinking abilities deteriorating. "I perceived my writing and thinking deteriorating as it was happening," Brooks explained, having studied nonfiction writing. "I encountered difficulties in recalling information and synthesizing ideas."

Engaging AI tools to alleviate cognitive effort in tasks is known as cognitive offloading. Examples include using a calculator for mathematical problems or a calendar to remember appointments. AI, such as Claude and ChatGPT, can perform complex calculations and remember personal events, but they can also compose term papers or generate work presentations—an unprecedented scale of cognitive offloading.

Cognitive offloading is not inherently detrimental; it's the foundation of human productivity. However, as more cognitive tasks are delegated to AI, there's a risk of developing forgetfulness or seeing declines in certain skills like writing. This phenomenon is termed de-skilling, an old economics concept that has gained prominence as a buzzword to describe the downward spiral of competence accompanying the widespread use of AI tools.

De-skilling can impact critical thinking, writing abilities, creative processes, and memory, as overreliance on AI may hinder one's ability to remember information independently.

Written by urgent.news from Vox's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at vox.com →

More in AI

I'm building a companion island for my desktop AI assistant: approvals, a mascot, and a 14px wake strip

I'm building a desktop AI assistant, and it has a permission problem that no amount of prompt engineering fixes. Ankita asks for approval before it does anything irreversible — sends a message, runs a…

  • Reporter building companion island for desktop AI assistant
  • Island includes three views (Petit tab, Home, Home expanded) and 14-pixel wake strip
  • Keyless Composio sign-in and MCP approval tiers introduced alongside

MCP for tour guides: building a remote MCP server with ~100 tools and OAuth

I work on Your Next Tours, an app tour guides use to broadcast live audio to their group from their phone. Guests scan a QR code and listen in the browser.

  • Remote MCP server built for tour guides to connect AI models
  • Server uses Streamable HTTP with 100 tools and OAuth 2.1 + PKCE
  • Ory Hydra handles authentication and authorization process

A Local AI System Reliability Agent with Gemma 3 4B

This is a submission for the Hacktoberfest Weekend Challenge: Build for a Friend What I Built I built a local AI system reliability agent that monitors a Windows computer, stores system metrics…

  • Local AI system reliability agent developed for Hacktoberfest Weekend Challenge
  • Gemma 3 4B local AI model used to analyze system trends and provide insights

Is your AI agent worth its tokens? We measured it with TigerGraph

Is your AI agent worth its tokens? We measured it with TigerGraph Tags: ai, rag, graph, python Everyone is bolting agents onto retrieval. Almost nobody asks what they cost.

  • Only 3% of questions benefit from AI agents according to TigerGraph study
  • OCCAM tool assesses AI agent value by routing questions through tiers
  • Tier 0 answers 98 questions with zero tokens, tier 1 costs around 830 tokens

More from Saturday 3 October →