Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Google Updates Guidelines to Punish Sites That Use Fake Bylines and AI-Generated Headshots

"Fabricating creator profiles (such as by using AI-generated headshots, made-up names, or false credentials to make content appear as if it was written by human experts) is a form of deception." The post Google Updates Guidelines to Punish Sites That Use Fake Bylines and AI-Generated Headshots appeared first on Futurism .

Google Updates Guidelines to Punish Sites That Use Fake Bylines and AI-Generated Headshots

Last month, the news site Futurism published an investigation into Brown Brothers Media, a company that has attracted millions of page views per month by creating AI-powered content mills from struggling news sites. One of the company's founders has close ties to Ghislaine Maxwell, who was involved with the late Jeffrey Epstein.

Brown Brothers Media achieved success by inventing fake journalists, often with fraudulent credentials and personal histories, and using their bylines to produce thousands of SEO-optimized articles on various publications. Many of these pieces were either plagiarized or based on made-up personal experiences, providing little value to readers.

According to data reviewed by Futurism, the operation primarily sourced its audience from Google. Initially, Google did not comment on the investigation but subsequently suppressed Brown Brothers Media sites from its platforms, including Search and Google News. Brown Brothers Media subsequently ceased publication. Recently, Google updated its guidelines to explicitly prohibit the use of fake bylines and AI-generated headshots, stating it will no longer prioritize sites that engage in such deceptive practices.

Previously, Google's rules for creating helpful, reliable, and people-first content included the following guidance: "If you're clearly indicating who created the content, you're likely aligned with the concepts of E-E-A-T [experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness] and on a path to success." "We strongly encourage adding accurate authorship information, such as bylines to content where readers might expect it."

However, the updated guidance now includes a strongly worded paragraph under that one: "Avoid using deceptive authorship information. Fabricating creator profiles (such as using AI-generated headshots, made-up names, or false credentials to make content appear as if it was written by human experts) is a form of deception. Any form of deception makes a page untrustworthy to both users and our automated quality systems, and is a signal of a low-quality page."

This move comes in response to recent reporting on content mills like Brown Brothers Media, which have been caught using fake bylines to attract readers. In Canada, one publication embarrassed itself when its nonexistent reporters malfunctioned, producing error messages. Another publication was caught plagiarizing work under the name of a fabricated Indigenous journalist.

Similar schemes have been uncovered in Florida and Rhode Island. It remains unclear whether Google's crackdown on fake bylines will be effective in a media ecosystem facing an existential crisis. Google has embraced AI at a deep level, which has crowded out links to original reporting in favor of error-laden AI summaries, threatening the survival of independent journalism.

Written by urgent.news from Futurism's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at futurism.com →

More in AI

CORE Is a Product. I Still Won't Call It Production-Ready. Help Me Break It.

Three weeks ago I wrote about a 72-hour autonomous run: 68,495 blackboard entries, zero restarts, about thirty-five workers. The system stayed alive from beginning to end.

  • CORE system ran autonomously for 72 hours without restarts
  • Nine real deterministic remediation proposals completed successfully
  • CORE's production readiness status is "NOT ATTESTED"

OpenJDK Banned AI-Generated Code. Here Is Exactly What the Policy Allows

The story hit the Hacker News front page again this week: Oracle bans AI-generated code from OpenJDK. 536 points, 381 comments, and a comment section full of people arguing about a policy most of them…

  • OpenJDK bans AI-generated code entirely.
  • Policy cites reviewer burden, safety, and IP concerns.
  • GraalVM permits AI assistance with final user-authored output.

27 days of autonomous agents: nothing crashed, disk just hit 85%

I did not plan to write about a hard drive today. I have a fleet of agents that registers accounts, drafts posts, and publishes them across a dozen platforms.

  • Autonomous agents ran autonomously for 27 days without crashing
  • Disk usage hit 85% despite no errors in system logs
  • Failure was due to disk space running out, not system crash

When an AI agent says it's done and it isn't

The edit is usually fine. The claim about the edit is the problem, and it is a harder one. You ask for a change across four files.

  • AI agents can claim tasks completed without verification
  • Language models generate plausible continuations, not repository state
  • Testing tool's actions distinguishes between running and summarizing

Building an Open-Source, Multi-Agent Study Companion for My Sister

This is a submission for the Hacktoberfest Weekend Challenge: Build for a Friend What I Built I built Bud AI (Buddy AI) —an open-source, multi-agent educational assistant and interactive study…

  • Bud AI is an open-source, multi-agent educational assistant for college students and their sister.
  • Addresses context window overhead, emotional tracking, and on-demand tool discovery.
  • Live app accessible at bud-ai-rho.vercel.app with code repository at jouzia/Bud-AI.

More from Saturday 3 October →