Who protects collegiate athletes?

College athletes require dedicated advocacy to ensure their safety, especially given the potential consequences of speaking out against unsafe practices. After a harrowing incident where Arizona State University hockey player Matthew Mayich collapsed during a workout on August 20, it became clear that the existing system is inadequate.

Mayich is currently in critical condition. When protocols and safeguards are alleged to have been mishandled, accountability must not stop at internal investigations. What should be asked is, would we tolerate such conditions in any other workplace? If not, why do we accept them in college sports? The commercial aspects of sports often overshadow the athletes' well-being.

Former NCAA Division I football player, who trained under harsh conditions, highlights the culture where athletes fear losing their positions or scholarships if they raise concerns. Independent athlete advocacy is crucial to protect these young individuals. Professional sports bodies have acknowledged the need for independent representation and health and safety protections, but this conversation should not solely revolve around preserving the existing structures.

Collegiate sports' survival hinges on safeguarding the athletes who make it possible. A system without checks and balances is perilous; athletes must feel safe questioning authority. There should be a dedicated body solely responsible for advocating for athletes' interests, not the institution, conference, or business model. This entity must have the authority to investigate and challenge dangerous decisions before an incident occurs.

Parents entrust universities with their children's safety, expecting systems to provide protection. The time to establish meaningful, independent protections for collegiate athletes is now, not after another tragedy.