Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Taxpayer paid Rs 1.24 lakh twice in 2022. Patna High Court now comes to his rescue

Taxpayer paid Rs 1.24 lakh twice in 2022. Patna High Court now comes to his rescue

In 2022, Patna resident Shashi Kant Singh faced a bizarre predicament where he was compelled to pay the same amount twice to the Central GST and Customs authorities. The court has now stepped in to rectify the situation, ordering a refund of Rs 1.24 lakh along with 12% annual interest and Rs 25,000 in litigation costs. The Patna High Court's division bench, led by Justices Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Sunil Dutta Mishra, expressed their frustration with the department's handling of Singh's case.

The court ruled that the authorities had "unnecessarily" forced the taxpayer to escalate his concerns to the court, stating that the matter was "very simple" and should have been resolved earlier. The case originated from a service tax demand of Rs 16.56 lakh, which Singh contested before the Commissioner (Appeals) in November 2022.

Singh was required to make a pre-deposit to proceed with the appeal, which he did through the ICEGATE portal on June 16, 2023. However, due to an error on the portal, Singh's payment was not acknowledged. Frustrated by the lack of response, he made a second payment via RTGS on the same day, only to receive no confirmation of receipt or any subsequent refund.

Written by urgent.news from The Indian Express's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at indianexpress.com →

More in World

Media action group flays NPP over new anti-terrorism law

Internet Media Action (IMA) has strongly condemned the government’s attempt, through the gazette “Protection of the State from Terrorism Bill” (PSTA) (22 September 2026), to restrict citizens’ freedom…

  • IMA criticizes NPP's anti-terrorism law for violating freedom of expression and media rights.
  • PSTA Bill viewed as digital dictatorship employing technology to reinforce repressive elements.

More from Friday 2 October →