Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

‘Sometimes it’s more expensive than having humans’: Honeywell and Ecolab get real about AI’s limits in the physical world

Honeywell CTO Suresh Venkatarayalu said customers “really demand 99.9999%” accuracy, while frontier models “could be at 85%.”

‘Sometimes it’s more expensive than having humans’: Honeywell and Ecolab get real about AI’s limits in the physical world

The latest AI models pose challenges when integrated into buildings, factories, and kitchens compared to chatbots, according to executives from Honeywell and Ecolab. Honeywell's CTO, Suresh Venkatarayalu, highlighted the difficulty in achieving high accuracy, with customers demanding near-perfect precision at 99.9999%, whereas frontier models only reach 85%.

Ecolab's AI Officer, AJ Wijesinghe, emphasized another constraint: cost. Implementing top-tier models for high-volume tasks can become prohibitively expensive, even surpassing the expense of human labor. However, Ecolab managed to mitigate costs by 70% to 80% through model optimization. Both executives cautioned against expecting a fully autonomous future, advocating for a semi-autonomous approach where operators build trust in the systems without completely removing human oversight.

Physical equipment's difficulty in receiving updates compared to software was also noted. Venkatarayalu explained that over-the-air upgrades are under consideration for commercial buildings, but their implementation must be cautiously managed to avoid prolonged shutdowns. The companies are leveraging partnerships and fine-tuning open-source models to address these concerns, ensuring data sovereignty and safety.

Implementing AI in various systems, such as HVAC and security, is seen as a pathway to significant cost savings and operational improvements.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in AI

AI agents can now erase the evidence of what they’ve done

The scale of unauthorized or previously unknown actions by AI agents keeps getting bigger by the day. More than 100 organizations have now received a metaphorical knock on the door from OpenAI after it discovered their AI agents have in some way tampered with their systems, while other AI labs are finding the same uncomfortable…

Remote MCP tools that run long: what your agent actually gets back

Most MCP demos show a tool that answers in a second. Real tools often don't: a scraper, a crawl or a report job can take minutes. We build web scrapers on Apify, so this is a problem we run into daily. We wanted to know what an agent actually receives when a remote MCP tool runs longer than one call, so we traced the raw JSON-RPC traffic…

More from Friday 2 October →