Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Self-hosting break-even: $23/month of SaaS, a $170 mini PC, about 9 months

Replacing $23/month in SaaS subscriptions (Google One 2TB + 1Password + Plex Pass) with a $170 mini PC drawing 15W idle breaks even in about 9 months. Replacing $10/month in Google storage with an $800 server never pays back. Both answers come out of the self-hosting break-even calculator on my site. The gap between them is the argument. What you're replacing is the most important variable. The…

Replacing $23 per month in SaaS subscriptions, such as Google One 2TB storage, 1Password, and Plex Pass, with a $170 mini PC consuming 15W idle results in a break-even point around 9 months. However, replacing the $10 monthly cost of Google storage with a $800 server does not yield a payback period. The key variable here is what you are replacing, making self-hosting more cost-effective for some services but not others.

The ongoing costs after hardware amortization remain a factor, with electricity being the most significant expense. Factors like electricity rates, hardware choice, and usage patterns significantly impact the break-even timeline. A $300 mini PC used for 5 years would cost $5/month in hardware amortization, while the same box used for 7 years would cost $3.57/month.

The break-even analysis excludes hardware amortization, focusing on operating savings to recoup the purchase price. The calculator's outputs demonstrate the time required to break even for different hardware choices, with the $170 N150 mini PC offering the fastest payback at around 9 months. Ultimately, self-hosting can be a cost-effective alternative for certain services but may not always prove cheaper depending on the specific use case and hardware utilized.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

My writing linter can be defeated by writing more. I measured how much more.

I ran my writing checker over one of my own published posts twice: once on the whole file, once on just the body with the front matter removed. Same post. Same prose.

  • Writing linter scores unchanged when front matter removed
  • Density-based tests can be reduced by adding non-objective text
  • Separating set-based and density-based scores prevents padding

How long do you keep a published claim provisional?

I retracted a benchmark this week. Two weeks ago I published a timing figure, described it as a fixed cost, and built an argument on it.

  • Author faces decision on retaining provisional claim validity.
  • Four instances of correcting published figures due to various issues.
  • Author suggests treating numbers as provisional with changelog.

More from Thursday 1 October →