New Book Chronicles Studio Museum in Harlem's 58-Year History
Contributors include artists such as Dawoud Bey, who wrote that the venerated institution has "changed the shape of my life."
The Studio Museum in Harlem, a landmark institution in the heart of New York City's Harlem neighborhood, has been celebrating its 58th anniversary. The museum, renowned for its commitment to showcasing Black art, opened its doors to the public in 1968 and recently completed a $160 million renovation. This new book, "The Studio Museum in Harlem: A History," chronicles the museum's journey over the past five decades, edited by Romi Crawford, a professor at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.
The book, to be released on October 27 by Yale University Press, is a collective endeavor, featuring the perspectives of artists, curators, scholars, and community leaders who have all played a role in the museum's storied history. It offers a comprehensive look at the museum's founding, its legacy, and the challenges it has faced throughout its existence. The publication comes nearly a year after the museum reopened its doors in a brand new building located at 125th Street and Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Boulevard.
The museum's transformation was not without controversy. In 2023, founding director David Adjaye stepped away from the project following allegations of sexual misconduct, which he vehemently denied. The museum had been closed since 2018 to accommodate the new building, designed by Adjaye Associates. However, the new structure has allowed the museum to regain its momentum and continue its mission of promoting Black art to a global audience.
Written with the collective spirit of the museum, the book reflects the collaborative nature of the institution. Thelma Golden, the current director and chief curator, emphasizes this point in her foreword, highlighting the museum's dedication to fostering a cosmopolitan space that transcends boundaries and welcomes art enthusiasts from all walks of life.
Written by urgent.news from Hyperallergic's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
