Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk successor is obvious, he's perfect
Virgil van Dijk will be a month away from being 36 years old in June 2027. The towering Dutchman has been a rock in Liverpool's back-line for as long as anyone can remember.His £70 million transfer f...
As Virgil van Dijk inches closer to turning 36 in June 2027, speculation surrounding his future at Liverpool has grown stronger. The towering Dutch defender has been the backbone of Liverpool's defense for several years, and his absence could prove costly for the Reds. With no new contract discussions in sight, it's possible that Van Dijk could be heading towards the exit door at the end of the season.
Enter Nico Schlotterbeck, a rising star in the world of football, as an obvious successor to the Liverpool legend. The 6-foot-4 German defender, who recently signed a new deal with Borussia Dortmund, has been one of the most important defenders at his club. Just like Van Dijk, Schlotterbeck spent his early years honing his skills at Borussia Dortmund, where he eventually made his mark as a top-flight defender.
In the past, Liverpool had already shown interest in Schlotterbeck, who has since added a release clause to his contract that includes Liverpool. This shows their commitment to securing him for the long term. Although the Reds didn't manage to sign him in the summer due to an injury, Schlotterbeck's performances have caught the attention of the Merseyside giants again, making him a prime candidate to replace Van Dijk.
With Schlotterbeck's Champions League experience and Premier League-ready skills, he has the potential to fill Van Dijk's shoes perfectly. As the transfer window opens, Liverpool could have a plethora of options to choose from, but Schlotterbeck seems to be the clear favorite. If Van Dijk does leave Liverpool at the end of the season, the club will need a plan in place to ensure their defense remains as strong as ever, and Schlotterbeck could be the perfect answer to that question.
Written by urgent.news from Yahoo Sports's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.