Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Girls Who Code CEO: the most discerning people in the AI debate aren’t in Silicon Valley. They’re teenage girls

Teen girls aren’t falling behind, they're asking better questions — and showing AI companies what user agency looks like.

Girls Who Code CEO: the most discerning people in the AI debate aren’t in Silicon Valley. They’re teenage girls

Artificial intelligence leaders expressing concerns about their technology potentially ending humanity might seem daunting, but there is a source of hope in an unexpected place – teenage girls. A recent study by Girls Who Code reveals that girls exhibit discerning behavior when it comes to AI usage, setting boundaries around privacy, safety, accuracy, creativity, and environmental impact.

They choose to prioritize privacy over personalization, wait for AI to be tested before using it, and avoid it if it causes harm. This cautious approach is evident in their higher rates of AI engagement when given the power to decide, with 88% of girls utilizing AI compared to 83% of boys. The gender gap in AI adoption narrows and even reverses when girls have agency over technology.

This trend is not limited to a specific age group, as initiatives like New York City's moratorium on student-facing generative AI and a South Philadelphia library's "Avoiding AI" workshops demonstrate that people of all ages are seeking control and agency in their use of AI. These efforts emphasize the importance of clear opt-out options, transparency about data usage, and channels for user feedback.

As companies increasingly adopt AI, they should heed these demands for more control and agency. By empowering young people with the understanding and choice to determine where technology fits into their lives, we can foster hope for a more ethically conscious AI future.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in AI

Understanding Word Embeddings: How Machines Learn the Meaning of Words

When I started learning Natural Language Processing (NLP), one question kept coming back to me: How can a computer understand words when words are just text?

  • Word embeddings represent words as numerical vectors for computers to understand word relationships.
  • Word2Vec limitations include reliance on training corpus quality and potential bias inheritance.

Playwright MCP for Claude Code: Let It Open a Real Browser and Click Through Flows (2-Minute Setup)

You ask Claude Code why the signup flow breaks, and it can only guess from the source. So you open the page, click through it yourself, copy what you see, and describe it back in words.

  • Playwright MCP server enhances Claude Code's web automation capabilities.
  • Setup takes approximately two minutes, involving a single command and Claude restart.
  • Claude can now navigate to URLs and read main page headings using Playwright MCP.

AI Autonomy: How to Find the Autonomy Your Agents Already Have

TL;DR A framework for measuring autonomy: The Cloud Security Alliance's six-level model (Level 0 to Level 5) gives security teams language for how independently an AI agent can act, from…

  • AI autonomy increases as agentic AI proliferates
  • Cloud Security Alliance provides five-level framework for autonomy
  • AI-service credentials surged 81% to over 1.27 million globally

More from Wednesday 30 September →