Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

We Didn’t Have a Product Problem. We Had a Memory Problem.

Building PRATHIDHWANI: A Memory-Powered Customer Feedback Intelligence System Using Hindsight A few months ago, I was sitting in a product discussion when someone asked a deceptively simple question: “Why did we decide not to build this feature?” The room went silent. One person vaguely remembered the discussion. Another thought it had something to do with customer feedback. Someone started…

A product development team discovered that their lack of a clear memory of past decisions was hindering their ability to effectively address customer feedback and product issues. The team realized that while they had a wealth of knowledge from various sources such as customer interviews, support tickets, roadmap meetings, engineering releases and retrospectives, this information was not connected and accessible.

One example of this issue was the repeated discussion about a rejected feature. The team couldn't quickly reconstruct the context of why the decision was made, and whether the reasoning remained relevant. This is a common problem that many teams face, where they revisit the same issues over and over again because the necessary information is scattered and not connected.

The solution the team developed was PRATHIDHWANI, which stands for Customer Feedback Intelligence. This system aims to address the memory problem by connecting customer feedback, product changes, and historical context. Instead of simply analyzing today's customer feedback, PRATHIDHWANI seeks to understand what changes occurred after previous feedback was addressed.

The core idea behind PRATHIDHWANI is to connect customer feedback to the actual actions taken by the product team. For instance, if hundreds of customers report problems with checkout, the system helps the team understand that this feedback led to a product change, and whether the release of the fix led to a decrease in complaints. This historical context allows the team to see if the original problem was truly resolved or if new issues have emerged.

PRATHIDHWANI's dashboard provides a visual overview of feedback trends and historical signals, showing positive and negative sentiment changes over time. It also highlights emerging issues that require attention. The most interesting insights come from observing how individual issues move over time, allowing the team to determine if their interventions were effective.

One important feature of PRATHIDHWANI is its ability to compare data with and without historical memory. Without this memory, an AI might only provide a generic present-state observation, such as "Export performance is good." However, with historical memory, the system can provide a more comprehensive answer, including the journey, the seriousness of the original issue, the changes made, and the impact on customers after the release.

In summary, PRATHIDHWANI tackles the memory problem that many product teams face by connecting customer feedback, product changes, and historical context. This connection allows teams to understand not just what is happening with their product, but why things are happening, leading to more informed decision-making and improved customer experiences.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

How Many Tokens Is That Elasticsearch Hit? A Reproducible RAG Compression Benchmark

This is a follow-up to my earlier post introducing jtoken . That one was the pitch. This one is the actual measurement — the benchmark I run before claiming any savings number, and how you can run it…

  • jtoken compression library evaluated for token savings in RAG pipeline
  • Benchmark uses real tokenizers (tiktoken) to measure compression impact
  • jtoken achieves 19.1% reduction for MongoDB docs, 13.2% for nested API events

Turning Noisy Press Pages Into Hindsight-Backed Competitor Trend Reports

Every Monday, my market-intelligence pipeline could correctly tell me that a competitor had announced a pricing change. What it could not tell me was whether that was actually new.

  • Market-intelligence pipeline integrates Hindsight as long-term memory layer
  • Pipeline distinguishes between new competitor changes and price trend repetitions
  • Hindsight enables competitor-specific history recall and market-level reasoning

I Built a Support Agent That Remembers Customers Between Chats

A support agent can give the right answer and still make a customer repeat themselves. I built this system around a simple idea: use long-term memory to carry useful context between conversations, but…

  • Memory layer uses Hindsight with unique bank per customer for retrieval.
  • Retrieval is tailored to current query, preventing random reiteration of stored information.

Cancelled customers who keep access: the Stripe webhook bug nobody reports

If you take subscriptions through Stripe, you keep two copies of "who is paying": Stripe's, and a column in your own database ( subscribed , is_pro , plan ...) that your app actually checks.

  • Stripe webhook bug allows canceled customers to retain access
  • Webhook only handles checkout.session.completed event, no revocation
  • Failure to replay failed events can result in permanent loss

More from Tuesday 29 September →