Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Business

Welcome to the age of omnipresent suspicion

A few days ago, I attended a conference where the speaker read his talk off his note cards. I immediately recognized ChatGPT’s fingerprints : “and this is where it gets interesting,” “it’s not X, it’s Y”… The topic was management, a field that already generates plenty of hot air without any help from machines. With AI in the mix, I tuned out after a couple of minutes. Had he spoken from an…

Welcome to the age of omnipresent suspicion

In recent days, a conference attendee noticed similarities between the speaker's presentation and those of ChatGPT. The talk, on the topic of management, was dry and difficult to follow. The speaker is not alone in experiencing this phenomenon, as AI-generated text has infiltrated various forms of communication, including emails, reports, and books. This has led to a new level of suspicion surrounding the authenticity of written works.

In France, this issue recently impacted one of the year's most celebrated novelists, Thélyson Orélien. After winning a major literary award for his novel "C’était ça ou mourir," Orélien was accused of having AI write the majority of his work. The claim went viral on social media and led to a wave of racist attacks against the author.

Despite denying the allegations, Orélien faced pressure from both the media and his publisher. Independent tests using AI detection tools showed varying results, with some detecting a high likelihood of AI involvement and others finding the text to be human-written.

The controversy surrounding Orélien's work highlights an ongoing "arms race" between AI detection companies and those who seek to humanize AI-generated text. Detection firms like Pangram, GPTZero, and Turnitin continuously improve their algorithms to identify AI-generated content, while writers and AI companies develop methods to make their work less detectable.

This cat-and-mouse game makes it increasingly difficult to distinguish between human and machine-written texts, leading to a growing mistrust in written communication.

The impact of this suspicion extends beyond literature, affecting professional settings as well. Colleagues are now more likely to question the authenticity of emails, reports, and other written materials. The proliferation of AI-generated text, coupled with the ease of creating such content, has led to a saturation of messages and a diminishing quality of written communication. As a result, attention spans are declining, and the value of written content is diminishing.

Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fastcompany.com →

More in Business

More from Monday 28 September →