Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

미·중 정상, ‘슈퍼지능 대화체’ 운영 합의…“AI 대신 SI로 부를 것”

In a summit held on November 25, former U.S. President Donald Trump and current Chinese State Leader Xi Jinping agreed to use the term "superintelligence" (SI) instead of "artificial intelligence" (AI) in referring to emerging technologies. The White House stated that they will operate a "U.S.-China Superintelligence Dialogue" to discuss the risks and benefits of SI technology.

The term "superintelligence" was more of a political expression from Trump, while China has not officially adopted the term yet. During the summit, both leaders discussed the potential risks and benefits of SI technology, as well as establishing a quantum communication channel to communicate during any incidents. Additionally, both nations agreed to install a "U.S.-China Superintelligence Dialogue" to discuss the related emerging technologies.

The summit also covered geopolitical issues, with both leaders expressing their concerns over Iran's nuclear program and North Korea's actions. Lastly, the U.S. and China agreed to launch the "U.S.-China Bilateral Trade and Investment Council" and agreed on a lower tariff rate for non-sensitive items in the $40.8 trillion (around 300 billion USD) trade volume.

Written by urgent.news from Hankyoreh's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at hani.co.kr →

More in AI

Using babies, Israeli study reveals why AI fails to truly understand animal calls

Even as AI masters human language, a groundbreaking Israeli study reveals a fundamental flaw in how AI decodes the animal kingdom: It hears the volume and pitch, but misses the point.

  • Israeli study reveals AI's failure to understand animal communication
  • AI should focus on neural and perceptual meaning, not just audio analysis
  • Researchers suggest combining AI with behavioral observations and nervous system research

Deepgram endpointing=300 Cut Off 22% of My Voice AI Users Mid-Answer

The user said, "The biggest trade-off I made on that project was..." and then paused to think. The bot jumped in with "Great, thanks for sharing! Next question." That pause was about 700 milliseconds. My Deepgram endpointing was set to 300. So as far as my pipeline knew, the person was done talking.

  • Deepgram endpointing set silence timer for speech-to-text systems
  • 300ms pause time cut off 22% of long answers in My voice AI
  • Two-gate system reduced cutoffs to 3.1% without increasing latency

More from Saturday 26 September →