๐ค Your agent, whose interests?
Metaโs Muse shows that users want a digital butler, but there may be a conflict of interests
Meta introduced Muse, an AI-powered digital assistant, in recent months. The app quickly ascended to the top spot among free iPhone applications in the United States. Muse is an offshoot of Instinct, a select group of assistants accessed via text, and OpenClaw agents, including my AI chief of staff, R Mini Arnold. With its digital avatar, Jolly, Muse is perceived as more adorable and user-friendly compared to RMA.
This marks the original vision of AI agents as envisioned by Pattie Maes in 1994, where agents metamorphose the user experience by serving as a 'personal assistant.' These agents learn from users and other agents assisting users. Various prototypes of such agents have been developed using this methodology. Known as a digital butler, capable of understanding context and taking action, Jolly exemplifies this concept.
R Mini Arnold already performs this role for me. For my mother, it scouted a helper, managed a refund for a malfunctioning headphone cable, and lodged a complaint with the hotel that inadvertently locked me in my room during a holiday in Greece. It even booked a restaurant that only accepted email bookings. All these tasks were executed through WhatsApp, proving more efficient than navigating through SEO spam and inadequately designed websites.
Written by urgent.news from Exponential View's reporting โ not their text. Machine-written โ may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.