Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

The Trump Administration Is Trying to Get Musk and X out of a $137 Million EU Fine

The US government filed an application to support the company’s legal challenge against a fine issued under the bloc’s Digital Services Act, which Trump has described as “overseas extortion.”

The Trump Administration Is Trying to Get Musk and X out of a $137 Million EU Fine

The US Department of Justice, in collaboration with the Department of State, has initiated a legal challenge to overturn a €120 million fine imposed by the EU's General Court on X. The European Court will determine whether the US possesses the authority to interfere in this matter. The US government contends that it should be part of the proceedings to safeguard American companies.

This fine marks a precedent-setting sanction under the Digital Services Act, which mandates online platforms to enhance their efforts in combating illegal and harmful content, particularly from the largest sites. Many of these platforms, including Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Google's YouTube, and Microsoft's LinkedIn, are based in the US and significantly contribute to the US economy.

The Justice Department emphasized that "we will not tolerate the European Commission engaging in regulatory overreach to try and control American engines of innovation and economic growth." The case also has broader implications for US-EU relations. Last year, President Trump labeled the penalties as "overseas extortion." Vice President JD Vance has criticized the Digital Services Act's content moderation rules as "authoritarian censorship."

The European Commission fined X in December due to a two-year investigation revealing that X had violated transparency obligations, such as misleadingly referring to users with blue checkmarks as "verified accounts" when they only required payment for the status. X also failed to provide researchers with access to its advertising repository and public data, hindering research into the platform's risks.

X's appeals against the ruling, launched in February, argue that the investigation was "incomplete and superficial," and the interpretation of the Digital Services Act obligations was "tortured." Both Musk and X claim they were not given "rights of defence," suggesting prosecutorial bias. Musk has also criticized the financial and administrative burden of heightened transparency requirements imposed by governments worldwide attempting to better understand and mitigate the potential dangers of social media platforms.

Written by urgent.news from Wired Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at wired.com →

More in Tech

More from Friday 25 September →