Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

SlowMist has yet to confirm crypto theft from iPhone Safari attack

The analyzed Safari sample targets iOS 18.4–18.6.2 using previously patched flaws, while its effectiveness on iOS 26.5 remains unverified.

SlowMist has yet to confirm crypto theft from iPhone Safari attack

SlowMist disclosed a Safari attack targeting iOS 18.4 to 18.6.2, though its effectiveness on iOS 26.5 remains unconfirmed. The attack, linked to a malicious webpage in iPhone Safari, aimed to steal crypto private keys and seed phrases. SlowMist has not independently confirmed any crypto theft from a victim compromised by this specific attack.

The attack reuses techniques from the DarkSword exploit chain, disclosed by Google Threat Intelligence Group in March. SlowMist's chief information security officer, 23pds, identified the malicious activity in early May, and they published their analysis on September 4. The attack code could access Apple's Keychain and app files, potentially exposing crypto wallet information.

SlowMist advised iPhone users to update their devices immediately and avoid suspicious links, also mentioning that Apple's Lockdown Mode could provide additional defense.

Written by urgent.news from Cointelegraph's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at cointelegraph.com →

More in Tech

‘System Failures Inevitable, Speedy Recovery Matters Most’

Nume Ekeghe The Group Chief Technology Officer of Parthian Financial Services, Arthur Augustus, has called for stronger infrastructure, greater transparency and deeper collaboration across Nigeria’s…

  • System failures are inevitable in Nigeria's fintech sector.
  • Swift recovery crucial for fintech resilience and continuity.
  • Dangote IPO revealed capacity and resilience issues in fintech infrastructure.

Nintendo wins $4.5 million lawsuit against Switch pirate by default

A Washington court granted Nintendo of America a $4.5 million default judgment after the defendant failed to appear in court and respond to the allegations. The company claimed that it sent a cease-and-desist letter and the respondent even answered via email saying they will comply and cooperate, but they have since cut-off…

More from Friday 25 September →