Ohio sheriff says Republicans, Democrats don't "have the guts" to fix U.S. immigration system

In the 2026 election cycle, Republican groups are pouring millions into trans-focused attack ads against Democrats, focusing on controversial sub-issues such as taxpayer-funded "sex change surgeries for children," the idea of biological men entering girls' locker rooms and bathrooms, and allowing trans women to play in girls' sports. Former Rep. Matt Gaetz encapsulated the message in an X post, stating, "Bro we need your vote. I hate the war too. But the Democrats want to trans your kids."

Democrats are responding to these attacks in various ways. Some have tried to change the subject, calling the attacks irrelevant and focusing on the issues that matter. Others have outright opposed the idea of men in women's locker rooms or trans women in women's sports, despite many within the party deeming such language as anti-trans. In 2024, Kamala Harris chose to ignore such attacks, hoping voters wouldn't find them relevant, but her defeat led Democrats to seek a different approach.

Some high-profile Democrats are adopting more conservative positions, while others are employing more conservative rhetoric or accusing their opponents of misleading voters with culture-war pandering. The reactions of Democrats to these attacks are closely watched by partisans and transgender rights advocates, who are concerned about how much Democrats will concede and whom they might alienate in the process.

This issue of how Democrats should handle the wave of well-funded trans-focused attacks is a bellwether for deeper questions within the party. It raises questions about the extent of Democrats' commitment to expanding rights, the degree of disagreement among Democrats on substantive issues, and the extent to which the party's diverse factions are represented in its leadership.