Former Miss Jamaica sues Miss Universe over onstage fall
Miss Universe Jamaica 2025 Gabrielle Henry has filed a lawsuit against the Miss Universe Organisation (MUO) nearly one year after her shocking fall from the pageant stage. According to a report from People, Henry brought five claims against MUO and two of its parent companies, JKN Legacy Inc. and Legacy Holding Group USA, in a […]
Hong Kong's 2025 Miss Universe Lizzie Li has dismissed allegations that she refused to cover the cost of repairing two damaged couture gowns presented during the 2026 Miss Universe Hong Kong finals. The issue arose after the evening gown's sponsor demanded HK$10,380 (RM5,400) for the repairs. According to the sponsor, Li had returned both gowns with damage, with one gown reportedly valued over HK$100,000 (RM52,000) and the other at 72,800 yuan (RM44,300).
A representative from the sponsor showcased broken beads and a loose beaded chain from one of the gowns, attributing the damage to pulling rather than loose stitching. The estimated repair bill was HK$16,000 (RM8,300), but the sponsor offered to split the cost and asked Li to contribute HK$10,380. Li denied the claim that she had intentionally damaged the gowns, stating that the damage might have been due to normal wear and tear, such as walking, sitting, or posing for photos.
She also pointed out that repair costs in Malaysia would be between RM100 and RM300. Screenshots of her WhatsApp conversations with the sponsor's representative, shared on Instagram Stories, showed Li refusing to outright refuse to pay, suggesting she would cover the costs if provided with original purchase receipts and an official repair invoice, or she would pay the full cost of repairs by an independent couture tailor.
Li questioned why the dispute went public while discussions were still ongoing, describing the sponsor's actions as defamatory and demanding the removal of the posts. The sponsor, however, maintained that they were not obligated to provide the requested documents.
Written by urgent.news from New Straits Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.