The AFL's gut feel to Neale's gut punch leaves fans dazed and confused

The AFL's decision to allow Lachie Neale to play in the grand final, despite his violent behavior during a previous match, has left fans perplexed and divided. Neale's team argued that his impeccable character was enough to warrant a lenient punishment, similar to how Scott Pendlebury was allowed to play despite a similar offense.

The AFL's reasoning, however, was convoluted and inconsistent, leaving many questioning the fairness of the decision. The nine players suspended this year for similar actions to Neale's question whether the AFL is serious about enforcing its rules, or if it only takes action when players lack significant accomplishments and crucial matches to play in.

While 42% of respondents in an ABC Sport poll believed Neale should be free to play, the decision has garnered criticism from footy legends who condemn the idea of missing out on a grand final for a minor foul. Despite the controversy, Neale will still take the field in the grand final, leaving fans and players alike to grapple with the absurdity of the situation.