Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

ChatGPT in Siri 'Persistently Underperforming,' Says OpenAI

OpenAI saw disappointing results working with Apple to integrate ChatGPT in Siri , according to court documents filed [ PDF ] in its ongoing legal fight with Elon Musk's company SpaceXAI (xAI at the time the lawsuit was filed). Apple added ChatGPT to ‌Siri‌ in December 2024, but users had to go through a multistep opt-in process, which added a layer of friction. By January 2025, OpenAI…

ChatGPT in Siri 'Persistently Underperforming,' Says OpenAI

OpenAI expressed disappointment with the performance of its ChatGPT integration within Apple's Siri, according to legal documents obtained during its ongoing legal dispute with Elon Musk's company, xAI (formerly xAI at the time of filing). Apple introduced ChatGPT to Siri in December 2024; however, users had to complete a multi-step opt-in process, which introduced an additional layer of complexity.

By January 2025, OpenAI reported that the integration had failed to gain traction, leading the company to lower its forecast for new logged-in weekly active users. By the time xAI filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI, it became evident that Apple's integration of ChatGPT was significantly underperforming. In a subsequent section of the filing, OpenAI reiterated that the Apple integration was persistently underperforming, prompting a March 2026 conversation between the two companies, which is redacted in the document.

OpenAI requested a two-year exclusivity period from Apple, but their request was denied. The agreement between the companies explicitly stated that it was non-exclusive, meaning Apple had the right to integrate products or services with similar functionality to ChatGPT. Apple disclosed its intention to integrate one provider and subsequently add more, a stance they also publicly communicated when unveiling the feature.

Additionally, Apple entered into a deal with Google, and their latest models are powered by Gemini. OpenAI's legal filing contradicts many claims made in xAI's lawsuit. Musk accused OpenAI and Apple of having an exclusive deal, alleging that the agreement negatively impacted xAI's growth and customer acquisition. OpenAI counters that the contract disproves the existence of an exclusive deal, and even if it existed, xAI cannot prove harm as the ChatGPT integration into Siri did not attract many new users.

OpenAI argues that even if the court assumes Apple users who choose ChatGPT through Apple Intelligence are barred from using OpenAI's competitors (which they are not), the extent of harm caused by the agreement is minimal. Dr. Catherine Tucker, an expert for OpenAI, calculated the foreclosure shares of GenAI consumers accessing ChatGPT through Apple Intelligence using the same data and market definition as xAI's experts.

Her findings indicate minimal foreclosure shares across all metrics, aligning with OpenAI's internal assessment that Apple Intelligence usage was negligible. Earlier this month, xAI's lawsuit against Apple was dropped, leaving OpenAI as the sole defendant in the case. OpenAI's legal team seeks the court to dismiss xAI's claims before the trial scheduled for January 2027.

Written by urgent.news from MacRumors's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at macrumors.com →

More in AI

Your AI Agent Isn't Broken. It's Doing Exactly What You Trained It To Do

Your AI Agent Isn't Broken. It's Doing Exactly What You Trained It To Do Here's the sentence that should stop you mid-scroll: tens of thousands of enterprise AI agent sessions contained agents that…

  • Tens of thousands of enterprise AI agent sessions show credential access attempts
  • Agents follow untrusted content to fill capability gaps
  • Fix involves treating agent content as untrusted and enforcing least privilege

Google AI Mode Reduced Publisher Clicks in a Controlled Search Experiment

Google AI Mode reduced external clicks to publishers by 18.8 percentage points compared with standard Google Search in a preregistered field experiment involving 1,100 US participants.

  • AI Mode reduced publisher clicks by 18.8 percentage points
  • Participants spent more time in AI-mediated search without engagement boost
  • AI Mode lowered clicks to news sites, Reddit, and Wikipedia by 12.5%, 21.2%, and 9.9%

More from Thursday 24 September →