Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

AI is already deciding whether or not people receive medical care

The AI freakout of the past few weeks has centered on nothing less than the risk of human extinction — on the possibility that artificial intelligence could wipe us all out. But the reality is, AI programs are already having a direct and sinister effect on people’s physical health: UnitedHealth Group, the largest health insurer […]

AI is already deciding whether or not people receive medical care

Recent weeks have seen a surge of concern over the potential risks AI poses to humanity, such as the threat of human extinction. However, the reality is that AI programs are already having a direct and harmful impact on people's physical health. UnitedHealth Group, the largest health insurer in the US, has been accused of using AI to deny payments to patients, despite doctors recommending necessary care, and is facing a class-action lawsuit.

Humana and Cigna are also under investigation for similar allegations. Meanwhile, Medicare has introduced an AI tool to aid in determining whether to approve prior authorizations, and doctors are receiving reports from patients who are distraught over not being able to obtain medicine for managing chronic pain.

The legal complaints in these cases paint a harrowing picture: families desperately seeking to keep an elderly loved one who has experienced a serious fall in a nursing home, while doctors find themselves frustrated when an algorithm cuts off a patient requiring months of rehabilitation after just a few weeks. This represents the current threat AI poses to people's health.

While the conversation may be focused on more Hollywood-inspired concerns, private insurers and the Trump administration have already begun deploying AI programs to scrutinize health insurance claims, with evidence suggesting these programs may not always function optimally and could put people's health at risk.

Until legal proceedings are resolved or policymakers devise a method to regulate how insurers utilize this new technology, it falls upon individuals to ensure that an AI program does not strip them of insurance benefits they are entitled to. Mika Hamer, a health services researcher at the University of Maryland, explains that clinicians' decisions are heavily influenced by a patient's unique circumstances, which often cannot be accurately quantified and thus are not suitable for inclusion in models.

Relying solely on models may cause us to lose the human touch in healthcare. Patients report that private health insurers are leveraging AI to deny claims. Insurers and patients have always engaged in disputes over medical claims, with policyholders seeking maximum coverage and payers striving to pay the least possible. Health insurers have long employed algorithms, using factors such as age, weight, and smoking habits to estimate medical care needs.

However, the newer AI programs can make precise predictions about future health based on the input data, which are then used in approving or denying medical claims. The exact information used to generate these predictions and who bears ultimate authority over them — the AI or the human — is frequently unclear to the public. Daniel Schwarcz, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, emphasizes that human review is crucial to ensure meaningful substantive judgment, while cautioning that distinguishing between AI supporting human processing and AI replacing humans with passive defaulting is extremely difficult, particularly in the realm of regulations.

Written by urgent.news from Vox's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at vox.com →

More in AI

This video is about how this video was made

This video (the script, the voice timings, the source code, the storyboard, the briefs the subagents got, the grade a reviewer gave an earlier draft) is the real artifact from making this video .

  • Video demonstrates AI creation process with Claude Opus 5.5
  • Every frame is pure function of time t, no randomness
  • Droste loop ending shows video drawing its own output canvas

Oracle's 'force majeure' notice raises questions about the company's ability to deliver on AI data centers

Oracle shares were down about 4% on Thursday amid investor questions about its ability to deliver on its massive AI infrastructure expansion.

  • Oracle sent force majeure notice to Blue Owl Capital over Project Jupiter.
  • Project Jupiter AI data center project remains on schedule according to Oracle.
  • Oracle shares dropped 4% amid concerns about AI infrastructure expansion.

AI/ML News

Update on NASA Foundation Model Progress: To the Moon and Beyond September 2026 – NASA’s foundation model (FM) work began taking shape in 2023 when the NASA Interagency Implementation and Advanced…

More from Thursday 24 September →