White House: Lee, Trump discussed shipbuilding cooperation, other topics during New York meeting
WASHINGTON, Sept. 23 (Yonhap) -- A White House official said Wednesday South Kor...
Washington — On Wednesday, the contentious dispute between President Donald Trump and media organizations he opposes expanded to a courtroom in the nation's capital, where a judge is examining if the president's prohibition of three news organizations from White House grounds infringes upon the Constitution. The administration has reaffirmed its stance that entry into the White House is a privilege, not a right, asserting in a court submission on Tuesday.
The administration also contended that the reporting from the three outlets — CNN, MSNBC, and Politico — threatens national security. Early remarks from Trump revolved around the negative coverage by the outlets and allegations of "fake news." Legal experts deem the case historic, with Katie Fallow, deputy litigation director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, noting, "No president has taken this explicit of a step" to ban entire news organizations simply due to their unfavorable reporting.
Written by urgent.news from The Korea Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Trump's ban of three prominent news outlets from White House is in court koreatimes.co.kr
- Newsmax CEO says he asked Trump to 'reconsider' White House media outlet bans thehill.com
- Trump administration's ban of three prominent news outlets from White House is in court pbs.org
- Legal expert breaks down White House media ban as federal judge still to issue ruling cbsnews.com
- Judge considers restoring journalists' access to White House after Trump's ban npr.org
- The White House press pool: What is it and how does it work? aljazeera.com
- Judge concludes Trump's White House media ban hearing with no ruling abcnews.com