Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Don't count the savings until you know what the AI actually costs

Before counting AI-driven savings, businesses need visibility into what AI actually costs.

Don't count the savings until you know what the AI actually costs

For the past two years, discussions around AI have primarily centered on job displacement and automation. However, enterprise customers are now raising a different concern: the hidden costs associated with AI implementation. Boards, executive teams, and business units have been spurred to adopt AI tools rapidly, but they are now facing mounting bills that they didn't anticipate.

Organizations are discovering they have limited visibility into AI consumption, leading to budget overruns, runaway token usage, and unexpectedly large invoices.

AI's integration into daily business applications, such as Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, SAP, Workday, and LinkedIn, is exacerbating this issue. Every AI decision and action incurs a cost, from reasoning and retrials to planning, triggering calls, leveraging data and compute. AI is embedded in various teams across an organization, including marketing, sales, product, and development. With agentic AI expected to increase token consumption by 24-fold by 2030, AI spend is becoming more widespread.

Without visibility into AI costs, organizations lack the foundation for governance, control, and accountability. When making workforce decisions based on projected AI savings, it is crucial to consider all cost components, including token consumption, infrastructure, data platforms, cloud resources, failed attempts, retries, and the human oversight required to validate outputs and manage exceptions.

AI costs can move around, spreading across different systems, teams, and budgets, making them difficult to measure accurately.

The answer is not to halt AI innovation or abandon AI initiatives. Instead, organizations must understand where AI creates value, its operating costs at scale, and how to make informed decisions about AI adoption. This requires visibility into which AI applications, agents, and models are being used, token consumption, cost accumulation, and usage mapped to business units, products, and outcomes.

By gaining this visibility, organizations can make informed decisions about optimization, such as selecting different models, identifying unnecessary consumption, and discovering when lower-cost alternatives can achieve the same outcome. Ultimately, understanding AI's economics is essential before making financial decisions.

Written by urgent.news from TechRadar's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at techradar.com →

More in AI

Why I Built CartLens: An AI Receipt Scanner for Local Price Comparison

Online shopping has trained us to expect price transparency . Before buying a laptop, pair of headphones, or household item online, we can open several tabs, compare sellers, review price history, and…

  • CartLens is an AI-powered receipt scanner
  • Designed for local price comparison
  • Helps shoppers determine overpayment

Jev vs Laya: The Same AI Idea, One Closed and One Open

A new category of AI model landed this month, and it arrived twice at once. First came Jev, a hosted product from TypeSafe AI.

  • Jev and Laya are AI models with similar functionality but different approaches
  • Jev handles many options well, Laya is faster on a single GPU
  • Choice depends on processing speed vs customization needs

Glasshouse v0.1 Is Out: A Memory Benchmark for AI Systems

Glasshouse v0.1 is out. It's a long-term memory benchmark for AI systems, and it's what my last two benchmark posts here were about. If you haven't read those, here's the short version.

  • Glasshouse v0.1 provides a memory benchmark for AI systems.
  • Benchmark includes 2,847 questions across 10 languages and 50 photos.
  • System performance degradation tracked as conversation grows.

More from Tuesday 22 September →