When presidents ban journalists from the White House, the First Amendment is not the only constitutional right at stake
When President Trump barred three news organizations from the White House, a lawsuit followed. In it, the news outlets invoked their Fifth and First amendments rights.
President Donald Trump has recently taken action to prohibit journalists from accessing the White House, sparking concerns about the potential breach of constitutional rights. On September 19, 2026, CNN, MS NOW, and Politico were denied entry by President Trump, who expressed his dissatisfaction with their "constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" Social media users quickly shared the news, with many criticizing the ban as a violation of the First Amendment.
While past presidents have attempted to restrict journalists' access to the White House, such as when President Trump revoked Jim Acosta's credentials during his first term, there is no Supreme Court precedent explicitly granting journalists the right to access the executive branch. However, two constitutional rights come into play in this situation: the First Amendment and the Fifth Amendment's due process clause.
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the press, which many argue is being violated by the White House ban. In 2018, a federal court granted CNN a temporary injunction to restore Jim Acosta's press pass, citing the importance of preventing a chilling effect on journalists covering elected officials. Critics, including White House Correspondents' Association President Jacqui Heinrich and law professor Jonathan Turley, have called Trump's latest ban unconstitutional, arguing it would be an assault on the free press.
However, it is essential to consider the role of due process in this case. In 1977, Robert Sherrill, a reporter for The Nation, was denied a press pass after holding one for years. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Secret Service could not deny a press pass without providing "narrow and specific standards" and ensuring due process rights were upheld. This includes providing notice of the factual basis for denial, an opportunity for rebuttal, and a written statement of the reasons for denial.
As the journalists' lawsuit is currently being filed, it remains to be seen how these constitutional rights will be addressed and whether the White House ban will be deemed constitutional under the First Amendment or the Fifth Amendment's due process clause.
Written by urgent.news from The Conversation's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
