When capture becomes infrastructure
The organisations carrying the most exposure today are usually the ones still running a capture strategy designed for the tools they had 10 years ago, says Smarsh.
Compliance strategies for regulated organisations have evolved significantly over time. In the past, they managed five to ten communication channels, including emails and recorded voice messages. Today, the landscape has expanded dramatically, with employees using platforms like Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Zoom, and even employing generative AI tools such as Claude Enterprise.
Matt Balcomb, Sales Director at Smarsh, emphasizes that an untracked communication channel poses a significant regulatory risk. Restricting the use of new tools often leads employees to utilize less visible platforms, rather than adhering to compliance requirements. Compliance teams typically adopt a piecemeal approach, utilizing one system for emails, another for call recordings, and so on, which results in a fragmented and uncoordinated capture strategy.
This fragmentation poses a risk, as compliance failures often occur in areas that are not adequately monitored. To address these challenges, Smarsh Capture consolidates all communication channels into a single platform, eliminating the need for multiple capture products and simplifying the regulatory process. By connecting disparate identities and preserving the full context of conversations, Smarsh Capture ensures that compliance teams can uncover the complete picture of an individual's communications.
This comprehensive approach not only satisfies legal requirements but also enables cross-functional teams to access rich, structured data for various purposes, including litigation, analytics, and product development. By treating capture as an infrastructure layer rather than a series of individual purchases, organisations can more readily adopt new communication tools without the lengthy procurement processes typically associated with such initiatives.
Written by urgent.news from ITWeb's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.