Changing the President's Cashier
Replacing the Finance Minister does not guarantee more technocratic fiscal management. The root of the problem lies with Prabowo.
The dismissal of Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa, while seemingly an attempt to bring more fiscal discipline, may not be the solution to Prabowo Subianto's preferred financial management style. The underlying issue, according to the story, lies with Purbaya himself. After his dismissal, the new Finance Minister, Suahasil Nazara, will face a similar predicament, as his professional expertise in monetary matters will likely clash with Prabowo's ambitions, which often diverge from economic principles.
Purbaya's handling of the State Budget, which prioritized the President's favored programs over fiscal responsibility, resulted in strained relationships with key subordinates, including his deputy Suahasil. While Suahasil's knowledge and experience may be beneficial, he will have to navigate the delicate balance between fiscal prudence and his loyalty to Prabowo.
The Finance Minister's role appears to be reduced to managing revenue and paying bills, with little room for decision-making. To restore confidence in the State Budget, the central government must stop shifting fiscal burdens to regional governments to finance Prabowo's initiatives, preventing regional fiscal crises and stalling development and public services.
Ultimately, as long as Prabowo continues to push for expansive projects without fiscal restraint, the Finance Minister will remain a pawn in the President's financial chess game.
Written by urgent.news from Tempo.co English's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.