Both parties embrace Supreme Court spending limit ruling in midterm home stretch
Both parties are embracing the Supreme Court’s summer ruling that allows parties to coordinate and spend unlimited amounts of money with campaigns as marquee midterm races head into the home stretch. The Senate Republicans’ campaign arm is spending over $45 million in coordinated expenditures with other candidates, according to a campaign report filed on Sunday....
The Supreme Court overturned a decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had previously accepted an Aadhaar card as a valid document to determine the age of a road accident victim in order to grant compensation. The court ruled that the victim's age had to be determined based on the date of birth mentioned in his school leaving certificate under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
The bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Ujjal Bhuyan cited a circular from the Unique Identification Authority of India, dated December 20, 2018, which stated that while an Aadhaar card can establish identity, it is not a proof of date of birth. The court agreed with the claimants who argued that the age should be calculated based on the school leaving certificate, and upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's judgment that granted compensation based on the victim's age as per the school certificate.
The victim had died in a road accident in 2015, and the initial compensation of ₹19.35 lakh was later reduced to ₹9.22 lakh by the High Court after it found that the MACT had incorrectly applied an age multiplier when determining the compensation.
Written by urgent.news from The Hindu's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
